Network On-Line  

      Activists Newsletter November 2006

homeaboutdownload networkMAG e-mail listscampaignsMAG links

November 2006

Front Page

Down Load Network

Network Front Page

Action Briefing UK

Front Number Plates Lobby

Mini Motos-Accidents Lobby

Surveys

Action Briefing Europe

DLD Calling London

DLD South East

Campaigns Reports

Public Affairs

MAG National Committee

August Minutes

FEMA

Campaigns Officer

MAG News

New Campaigns Manager

Vehicle Blind Spots

Mini Motos

Diesel Stickers

Reps Activists Training

News

Awareness Videos

Stern Review

Congestion Road Pricing

The Poor Of The Roads

Flawed and Deadly

ANPR - Speed Cameras

Box Camera Junctions

Other Bits

Tip Of The Month

Obituary

ID Cards And Issues

Microchipped Like a Dog

MAG Affiliated Clubs

Club Village Farmyard Party

Events

Events MAG UK

Party With A Purpose

Previous Issues

Previous Issues

'PRICE THE POOR OFF THE ROADS' SCHEME WON'T WORK TO EASE CONGESTION

The Times on Oct 20th reported on congestion charging trials on motorways.

Congestion charging does not work but it does price the poor off the road.

Safe Speed research exposed fundamental flaws in the government's road pricing dreams.

They simply are not allowing for the demand regulation effects of journey time.

When congestion takes place travel takes longer and some people simply don't have the time to travel.

This caused congestion to ease in a self regulating cycle.

With road pricing the increased cost tends to deter poorer road users from travelling - so far so good - but the reduced congestion is attractive to better off road users who take advantage so restoring congestion to similar levels.

They say that congestion costs business 20 billion pounds per annum – but that's already a congestion cost.

Thousands of businesses have already relocated out of town centres for better roads connections.

That's why there's an economic boom along the 'M4 corridor'. For those businesses congestion is already a road pricing scheme and business works to minimise costs.

In fact, Paul Smith, of the Safe Speed road safety campaign (www.safespeed.org.uk ) says: "Traffic levels haven't grown in London for about 30 years. That's because London traffic is already at capacity.

The London congestion charge has made little or no difference to congestion, overall traffic levels or journey times - but you have to read TfL self-congratulatory reports carefully to find the truth.”

National charging would be one of the largest white elephants ever created.

There ought to be a law about governments using hugely expensive technology to regulate the population.

We don't want it.

 We don't need it and it won't even work; just look at this governments record on IT.

It's curious that a Labour government is so determined to price the poor off the roads to make way for the rich?

The practicalities of national road user charging are mind boggling. Just imagine trying to collect 25 million monthly bills.

Just imagine the billing disputes. Just imagine the scale of the technology and the opportunities for breakdown at every level.

Then there's privacy.

 What if you don't want your wife to know you have visited your mistress three times in the last month?

Then there's evasion.

 People will look for ways to evade or undermine the system.

 It's amazing what you can do with a laptop and a few tools in a closed garage in 30 minutes.

Who will save us from road pricing madness?

Article in Today's times: HERE