Network On-Line  

      Activists Newsletter February 2006

homeaboutdownload networkMAG e-mail listscampaignsMAG links

February 2006

Front Page

Down Load Network

Network Front Page

Action Briefing UK

Mini Motos

MAG NewsLetters

Action Briefing Europe

Italian Madness

Success MAG NL Barriers

Worst Emissions for Bikes?

MAG AGC 2006

Annual Group Conference

Petitions

Petition to Save Bike Club

MAG News

Fred Hill Runs

New Think Campaign

Get Active!

News

Motorists Action Group

A Date With The Queen

Wire Dangers

CCTV to Your Mobile

Other Bits

Raced A Hardley Today

ANPR - Speed Cameras

Surveillance UK

Biker Brakes Cameras

Paranoia of the Premiership

Pace Cars

MAG Affililated Clubs

Calling All Clubs

Events

Events MAG UK

April Fools Party (NE Lincs)

Heart Of England

Into The Valley

MAG at the Moto GP

Previous Issues

Previous Issues

LATEST LUNACY: DONCASTER TO GET PACE CARS

In an astounding display of lunacy and ineptitude the Doncaster 'Road Safety Education Unit' has launched a scheme intended to recruit citizens for 'mobile traffic calming' duties.

In reality this means members of the public promising to keep within the speed restrictions at all times and displaying a sticker on their vehicle to say that they are doing so.

These misguided souls will then act as mobile barriers preventing following traffic from exceeding the speed restriction.

The scheme is both highly dangerous and totally unrealistic. It will undoubtedly INCREASE road dangers due a number of factors:

* Risks due to frustrated overtaking.

* Risks due to tailgating.

* Risks due to traffic bunching.

* Risks due to a pious attitude.

* Risks due to traffic obstruction.

Road safety works best when road users co-operate thus adjusting their speed to suit the hazard environment – but Doncaster's mad scheme undermines both of these principles.

Imagine, for one moment, the chaos that would be caused by a Doncaster-style pace car at 70mph in lane 3 of a UK motorway - but the Doncaster message appears to suggest that to do so would be 'good driving'.

This degree of incompetence is astounding, and someone in the Doncaster partnership should be held responsible.

Road safety depends on drivers adjusting their speed appropriate to the hazard in a given environment. The 'driving by numbers' approach is gradually, inexorably and dangerously replacing this vital behaviour.

British road safety is in a parlous state. The streams of false messages about the importance of the speed limit have left a generation of 'professionals' shooting at the wrong safety targets. The public has lost faith and turning off to the whole subject. Dumbing down the roads and does not work.'

The speed restriction does not represent a 'safe maximum speed'. It does no such thing and we all know it. We know it because we have to assess hazards and we have to adjust speed to suit the particular hazard.

Speed restrictions are a useful but minor part of road safety.

Modern road safety policy has promoted them way beyond their level of function from useful servant to cruel and incompetent master making us a nation obsessed with speed limits which is to say the least dangerous.