September 2004

Network Home Page

- Front Page

Down Load Network

NEWS
- Banning Young Pillion
 Riders Update

-
Tinted Trouble
- GAGM Report Revealed
- Red light changes hit bikes
- MAIDS
- A-Pillars
- N.Ireland Update
- Essex MAG and Bikesafe
- New Road Safety Initiative
- Stumping Up The Cash
- Recalls

ACTION BRIEFING UK
-
Humber Bridge Demo
-
MAG Foundation Crime
 Seminar
- Bikesafe
- HOV’s and M6 Toll
- Visor Insert Questionnaire

ACTION BRIEFING EUROPE
-
Overtaking and filtering

ACTION BRIEFING GLOBAL
-
Training in the US
- Meeting of the Minds
- Helmets Enforced
- New fines aimed at Parkway
- Bikers not to blame
- Nude Motorcyclist
- Southern Cross Conference
- Stiffer penalties

BEST PRACTICE
- Ideas

MAG Sport
-
When the Roads Not Enough

- MAG Events at MAG UK

- Previous Issues

Tinted Trouble

Strongly tinted inserts are to be withdrawn from sale after two leading manufacturers have admitted compromising rider safety – even though they are not actually illegal for road use in the UK. Popular Wholesaler Motrax, and Visionary Ideas have both been prosecuted by Northamptonshire Trading Standards.

Magistrates heard that Trading Standards were alerted after a police investigation into a fatal crash last year, which revealed the rider killed had a Motrax Gold Visor Insert. The insert in question cut light transmission to eight percent with many other visors in the range
offered by the two companies reducing light to only four percent. The legal limit for visors themselves in the UK is fifty percent.

According to Motrax they have been selling the inserts in good faith after being advised by Visionary Ideas that the products allowed 50% light emittence as stated on packaging. Both were made to pay fines and costs totalling more than £17,000 and arrangements have
been made to recall the products from sale.

The bike press are reporting that Motrax had relied on verbal assurances from Visionary, which had falsely stated on packaging that the insert “cuts out 50 per cent of ambient light”, when in fact it cut out 94 per cent.

Motrax has now incorporated new procedures to ensure that goods are tested and results known before marketing, and is now arranging recalls of the product. The two companies were prosecuted under the General Products Safety Regulations 1994 and the Trade Descriptions Act 1968 because of the wording on the packaging. The fines and costs totalled £17,579. Motrax pleaded guilty to four charges under the General Products Safety Regulations 1994 - £1,500 for each charge. Visionary pleaded guilty to three charges under
the General Products Safety Regulations 1994 and one under the Trade Descriptions Act 1968 - £2,000 for each charge. The rest was in costs.

A Motrax Spokesman told the press “Although the inserts do not contravene road traffic law and remain legal to use, any customer who has recently bought some, and is unhappy, should return the products with proof of purchase to the dealer from whom they bought
them for a full refund.”

Source http://smartnews.northamptonshire.gov.uk
Northamptonshire County Council

Issued 15 Aug 04

MAG Comment:

There is no specific legislation governing inserts, only for visors. Current Legislation requires that motorcyclists' visors comply with UN ECE Regulation 22.05 or British Standard BS4110:1979 (as amended).

These standards currently allow visors to have a light tint with a light transmission of no less that 50%. MAG requested this was reduced to 18% of light transmission for day time use to bring visor standards in line with the current permitted light transmittance for motorcyclists' goggles (See MAG's campaign on the web site from 2002).

The decision by the Transport Minister at the time was to keep the law as is.

What do you think ?

MAG needs your opinions in order to raise this issue again.

Please take a moment to answer the questionnaire on Page 12 in the ‘Action Briefing UK’ Section of this months Network.

 

 

MAG Network Copyright ©2005 All rights reserved.
MAG UK, PO Box 750, Rugby, CV21 3ZR. Tel. 0870 444 8 448  Fax. 0870 444 8 449